Supreme Court Backtracks on E-mail Service
The Illinois Supreme Court moved swiftly over the Christmas Holiday to revise the rules of service of court documents/pleadings. It had previously wanted to force all lawyers and parties to get set up for service and receipt of court papers by e-mail. (see post below) But last week the Court clearly has revisited whether that was such a good idea and has now revised the revised Rule 11.
Thus in this sudden about-face before the new rule was even effective, email service of documents is now just allowed, it is not mandatory. If a lawyer or party wants to get service by email, then he or she should list an email address on pleadings filed with the court. Summarized as follows:
struck through:
(2) by leaving them in the office of the attorney with the attorney's clerk, or with a person in charge of the office; or if a party is not represented by counsel, by leaving them at the party's residence with a family member of the age of 13 years or upwards;
(3) by depositing them in a United States post office or post office box, enclosed in an envelope, plainly addressed to the attorney at the attorney's business address, or to the party at the party's business address or residence, with postage fully prepaid;
(4) by delivering them to a third-party commercial carrier--including deposit in the carrier's pick-up box or drop off with the carrier's designated contractor--enclosed in a package, plainly addressed to the attorney at the attorney's business address, or to the party at the party's business address or residence, with the delivery charge fully prepaid; or
Thus in this sudden about-face before the new rule was even effective, email service of documents is now just allowed, it is not mandatory. If a lawyer or party wants to get service by email, then he or she should list an email address on pleadings filed with the court. Summarized as follows:
- If an email address is listed on pleadings and/or email is used by the sending party themselves, then that attorney or party consents to the use of email and service by email is valid.
- If an email address is not listed on the filed pleadings OR the party or attorney rescinds permission to use email, then service by email is not valid.
Rule
11. Manner of Serving
Documents Other Than Process and Complaint on Parties Not in Default in the
Trial and Reviewing Courts
(a) On Whom Made. If a party is represented by an attorney of
record, service shall be made upon the attorney. Otherwise service shall be
made upon the party.
(b) Method. Documents shall be served as follows:
(1) by delivering them
to the attorney or party personally;(2) by leaving them in the office of the attorney with the attorney's clerk, or with a person in charge of the office; or if a party is not represented by counsel, by leaving them at the party's residence with a family member of the age of 13 years or upwards;
(3) by depositing them in a United States post office or post office box, enclosed in an envelope, plainly addressed to the attorney at the attorney's business address, or to the party at the party's business address or residence, with postage fully prepaid;
(4) by delivering them to a third-party commercial carrier--including deposit in the carrier's pick-up box or drop off with the carrier's designated contractor--enclosed in a package, plainly addressed to the attorney at the attorney's business address, or to the party at the party's business address or residence, with the delivery charge fully prepaid; or
(5) by transmitting them
via facsimile machine to the office of the attorney or party, who has consented
to receiving service by facsimile transmission. Briefs filed in reviewing
courts shall not be served by facsimile transmission.
(i) A party or attorney
electing to serve pleadings by facsimile must include on the certificate of
service transmitted the telephone number of the sender's facsimile transmitting
device. Use of service by facsimile shall be deemed consent by that party or
attorney to receive service by facsimile transmission. Any party may rescind
consent of service by facsimile transmission in a case by filing with the court
and serving a notice on all parties or their attorneys who have filed
appearances that facsimile service will not be accepted. A party or attorney
who has rescinded consent to service by facsimile transmission in a case may
not serve another party or attorney by facsimile transmission in that case.
(ii) Each page of
notices and documents transmitted by facsimile pursuant to this rule should
bear the circuit court number, the title of the document, and the page number.
(6) by transmitting them
via e-mail to the designated e-mail address of record for the attorney or party
if the attorney or party consented to e-mail service. The listing of a
designated e-mail address on documents or the use of e-mail service shall be
deemed consent by that party or attorney to receive e-mail service. Any party
may rescind consent of e-mail service in a case by serving a notice on all
parties or the attorneys of record. A party or attorney who has rescinded
consent to e-mail service in a case may not serve another party or attorney by
e-mail in that case; or
(7) by transmission through
a service provider that provides an electronic in-box for those parties
registered to use the service.
(c) Multiple Parties or
Attorneys. In cases in which there
are two or more plaintiffs or defendants who appear by different attorneys,
service of all documents shall be made on the attorney for each of the parties.
If one attorney appears for several parties, that attorney is entitled to only
one copy of any document served upon the attorney by the opposite side. When
more than one attorney appears for a party, service of a copy upon one of them
is sufficient.
(d) E-Mail Address. A party or an attorney must include on the
appearance and on all pleadings filed in court an e-mail address for service of
documents. Mandatory E-Mail
Service. The use of e-mail service is mandatory if a local circuit
adopts mandatory e-filing pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Electronic Filing
Standards.
Amended April 8, 1980,
effective May 15, 1980; amended April 10, 1987, effective August 1, 1987;
amended October 30, 1992, effective November 15, 1992; amended December 29,
2009, effective immediately; amended Oct. 24, 2012, effective Jan. 1, 2013;
amended Dec. 21, 2012, eff. Jan. 1, 2013.
Committee Comment
(December 21, 2012)
New subparagraphs (b)(6)
and (7) were created to allow for service of documents electronically. The
amendments facilitate electronic communications among the court, parties, and
counsel and complement the expansion of e-filing in the trial courts. However,
electronic service may not be appropriate in all instances. For example, absent
a secure method for electronic service of documents, other service options
should be used for cases or documents filed confidentially.